 |
|

|
 |
 |

Noise Distribution Sample
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
  | The noise in a digital image sensor comes from several different sources. The largest component in modern sensors is due to the Poisson statistics of incident photons, proportional to square-root of the intensity. In very low light levels other noise sources become apparent. This is an examination of noise data obtained from a Canon EOS 20Da.
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
  | Here is a portion of a frame from an exposure taken through a telescope. The exposure was 1-second at an effective aperture of f/9.9 (Takahashi CN-212, at 2630mm with focal reducer). This is the shortest exposure that utilizes Canon's noise reduction method of obtaining a successive dark frame and processing. The ISO setting was 800, ambient temperature around 0 C0. A 16-bit linear tiff file was obtained from the camera raw file via the Canon EOS Viewer Utility, and a representative 560x440 pixel section obtained for analyzing.
 Albireo.noiseSample.1-3339.tif
|
A section from the background of a 1-sec exposure at f/9.9, ISO-800. The values have been multiplied by 255.
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
  | Only even-valued levels were observed in the data, so a histogram was created where values were split evenly between adjacent bin pairs. Here is the low end of the histogram along with a gaussian model that matches mean and variance.

|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
  | This may look like a reasonable match (apart from the obvious numeric scatter near zero), but I am mostly interested in the noise levels in the tail, which may have a strong impact when the image is scaled as part of a high dynamic range composite. To see the behavior in more detail, a log is taken. It is obvious that the normal distribution falls off rapidly compared with the observed noise.

|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
  | We obtain the cumulative distribution functions by summing (which also helps show the behavior of the low amplitude noise).

|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
  | Subtract from unity and take the log to examine the tail of the distribution, clearly showing the difference between the image data, and the gaussian model.

|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
  | Next, try to fit a composite noise model to these statistics. (Next page.)
|
 |
 |
|


 |
 |
 |